Hardware Encryption is Far More Secure than Software Encryption- Hardware encryption was once thought to be significantly more secure than software encryption. This is still believed by many people, even security specialists. And this was true in the past.
Hardware encryption, on the other hand, has been shown to be extremely weak in recent history. Spectre and Meltdown are two recently found hardware encryption flaws that have been widely publicised. Both Spectre and Meltdown take use of processor weaknesses.
A hardware-encrypted solid-state drive has also been shown to have serious security flaws, according to our dear buddy Steve Gibson (SSDs). Every SSD that experts have looked at has been determined to have such a serious flaw that retrieving encrypted data on these devices is nearly impossible. On his Security Now Podcast, Steve went over the details.
Backdoors and Poor Encryption Standards
Back doors are notoriously included by hardware producers. Companies and even governments are expected to integrate back doors at the chip level, which is a source of concern. This is both conceivable and plausible.
Hardware encryption flaws have also been reported as a result of bad procedures. Encryption keys, for example, may not be kept securely or may not be unique to each machine.
What is the solution?
The answer is straightforward. Make sure your data is encrypted with reliable software encryption. You’ll undoubtedly keep your data safer than if you just use hardware encryption. The software ought to be well-liked. Use a well-known encryption solution rather than a less well-known or obscure one. Because encryption is only as secure as its weakest link, strong encryption necessitates meticulous excellence in its operations.